|
|
Topic: High Limit going beyond 2024
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
Page 3 of 6 of 103 replies
|
|
|
September 21, 2024 at
09:57:41 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/07/2006
|
Posts:
|
2585
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: HoldenCaulfield on September 21 2024 at 12:10:15 AM
I don't think flo gives a shit or sees it as any kind of loss if the high limit guys run elsewhere when they are off. Why would they? The series was started to give racers a lesser schedule with only high paying races, and time off to race where they want, or take the weekend off when they are not scheduled. It's not a loss at all. It's a win/win.
If it actually costs 4-5G to run weekly shows, there would be zero cars at the track. It's expensive for sure but lets not get ridiculous. Last credible numbers I've heard were around half that.
Donnie's been outlaw since what 1997? He's way up there in their record books for wins and championships and never broken ranks in 27 years. Gee I'm so shocked he didn't leave for high limit.
Here's an idea. Since none of us know shit about these teams and their finances, lets just let them choose which series to run. I'm sure they all know what is best for their teams.
|
Well, as far as costs goes the figure to drop the door on the trailer is 6K according to Dominique Scelzi who pilots the 41 out of Fresno Ca...So the 4-5K is your figure? watch the clip with Dom on Flo...
Ascot was the greatest of all time..
West Capital wasn't half bad either..
Life is good...
|
|
|
September 21, 2024 at
11:31:28 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/31/2007
|
Posts:
|
4515
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: armyduke on September 21 2024 at 09:45:11 AM
I'll type slower for ya. The MYTH that High limit drivers (d r i v e r s, not s e r i e s);are running less races is false and was always known it would be false. This is based on the FACT that the following drivers have entered the following number of 410 winged sprint car races prior to Friday night.
Gravel 59. Sweet 60
Macedo 62. Abreu 65
Schatz 60. Courtney 63
Kofoid 63. Marks 68
Scelzi 62. Day 67
So who is running less???? Now where I went to school, I learned the numbers on the right are not less than the numbers on the left.
Also reference hotels on the west coast swing. 30 nights out westwould be considered more than 17 nights, hopefully I typed slow enough for you to comprehend that.
I eagerly await your comments again denying those facts above even though it's the second time you have been educated on them.
You will still argue the facts though because your opinion is again proved false.
|
Don't try to inject facts into the High Limit fanboy fantasies.
|
|
|
September 21, 2024 at
02:57:49 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
07/15/2023
|
Posts:
|
706
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: BStrawser26 on September 21 2024 at 09:18:36 AM
So they can say it is cheaper to do one rather than the other. I call bull*hit on this and have from the very beginning. Because that is what it is.
|
They made a business decision that went against your opinion so of course you come on here and wet your panties over it. Get a new act.
|
|
|
|
September 21, 2024 at
03:50:11 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
04/25/2017
|
Posts:
|
84
|
|
|
This message was edited on
September 21, 2024 at
06:13:57 PM by RunWYB
Reply to:
Posted By: onporch on September 21 2024 at 08:28:00 AM
HL would be foolish to drastically change their schedule. That is one of the appealing things about HL that has attracted so many full time drivers. In their first season they already have more full timers than the Outlaws and many high rollers have cited the schedule as a reason. And those guys didn’t drop off the tour like the doom-n-gloom folks here said they would do. Below is what Brian Ridge said about the schedule. I’m not trying to beat a dead horse with the same old repeated quotes. This is from a Sprintcarunlimited article this past week.
“Unless there is some seismic change, we are going to stay with High Limit and run as many Knoxville shows as possible with Aaron (Reutzel),” Ridge said. “We can go home a lot, and the freedom to pick-and-choose where to go is huge.
“The way they set their schedule up is more user friendly, whereas, we go with the Outlaws, and we wouldn’t have the opportunity to come home and race Knoxville. You are stuck where you are at, because they don’t let you race anywhere else. It’s just that freedom to go where you want and hit their shows.” And that right there is why so many teams like HL folks….
HL can grow their brand other ways with bigger races, more Flo customers, bigger name full time drivers, more tracks or series, NASCAR guests, and more full time drivers. I will believe your much repeated speculation (full time schedule and no freedom to race outside of HL) when it happens.
Donny Schatz runs his own business. If he ran with HL full time he would have to take a bunch of time off for their mid week races and the west coast swing. Taking time off may cost him money. With the WoO schedule he can run his business through the week and then fly to their weekend races and then fly how afterwards. I have heard he flies home after the Saturday night race. Considering his history, business, and airplane, the WoO schedule is perfect for him.
|
I am not speculating hi-limit is trending towards a no freedoms policy. never ever said that. to get people out of sensitive mode for defending one or the other I want to emphasize I love having both series - means more racing and less watching regular crap tv. Hi-limit to their credit will always I believe continue to allow freedom to their members to race elsewhere when they are not racing....I say kudos for their belief......I also understand WOO's exclusivity demands of 4 races only.
I will reiterate hi-limit was originally created as a midweek schedule as it benefitted or helped Kyle Larson race more...and I loved it! However, currently it is my opinion flo moved more of HI-limits schedule to weekends and not even Kyle Larson could slow that.....they flo want to compete versus their rival dirt vision.
and if this trend of more weekends continues there will be less opportunities for hi-limit teams to run these other shows. I can't blame flo or hI-limit one iota for this and I love it. Just means more racing for me to watch and keep driving both series to stay sharp and always seeking to improve their product.
again it is my opinion compared to last year both series have almost equally improved their product.....come on Strawser man support me here I know you believe in capitalism and competition on the open market it demands one working to improve their product for fear of becoming irrelevant.
I think Hi-Limit has been good for sprint car racing and I'm still a loyal follower of WoO still. I love the idea that for $450.00 annually I can watch a lot of my favorite past time and that is sprint car racing.
I will say for $150.00 flo sports is a way greater bargain...they are streaming so many other awesome sports...i have flo on all year as a racing and wrestling fan.
|
|
|
September 22, 2024 at
08:01:49 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/16/2009
|
Posts:
|
4212
|
|
|
This message was edited on
September 22, 2024 at
08:04:56 AM by egras
Reply to:
Posted By: armyduke on September 21 2024 at 09:45:11 AM
I'll type slower for ya. The MYTH that High limit drivers (d r i v e r s, not s e r i e s);are running less races is false and was always known it would be false. This is based on the FACT that the following drivers have entered the following number of 410 winged sprint car races prior to Friday night.
Gravel 59. Sweet 60
Macedo 62. Abreu 65
Schatz 60. Courtney 63
Kofoid 63. Marks 68
Scelzi 62. Day 67
So who is running less???? Now where I went to school, I learned the numbers on the right are not less than the numbers on the left.
Also reference hotels on the west coast swing. 30 nights out westwould be considered more than 17 nights, hopefully I typed slow enough for you to comprehend that.
I eagerly await your comments again denying those facts above even though it's the second time you have been educated on them.
You will still argue the facts though because your opinion is again proved false.
|
The problem he has is diffentiating between fact and opinion. I'll give an example:
Opinion: Our favorite Hoser is an idiot. That would be an opinion.
Fact: 3 years ago I camped next to about 20 fans from PA that know Strawser and all 20 of them said he's a complete moron. Although their feelings for him would be an opinion, it was a fact that these folks told me what they thought of him
|
|
|
September 22, 2024 at
08:33:13 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/07/2006
|
Posts:
|
2585
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on September 22 2024 at 08:01:49 AM
The problem he has is diffentiating between fact and opinion. I'll give an example:
Opinion: Our favorite Hoser is an idiot. That would be an opinion.
Fact: 3 years ago I camped next to about 20 fans from PA that know Strawser and all 20 of them said he's a complete moron. Although their feelings for him would be an opinion, it was a fact that these folks told me what they thought of him
|
Was I mistaken or is this not a sprint car message board?
Ascot was the greatest of all time..
West Capital wasn't half bad either..
Life is good...
|
|
|
|
September 22, 2024 at
09:41:55 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/16/2009
|
Posts:
|
4212
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: NWFAN on September 22 2024 at 08:33:13 AM
Was I mistaken or is this not a sprint car message board?
|
Message board, or no message board, you can't give an opinion, and then label it a fact. (That's only my opinion though)
|
|
|
September 22, 2024 at
12:55:44 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
10/21/2005
|
Posts:
|
552
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on September 19 2024 at 02:55:42 PM
Half way through last season, I "assumed" the High Limit would expand beyond a weekly fill-in show to a full time schedule. Everyone asked me why I was assuming this, and called me insane. Businesses either grow, or shrink. That's the only options. So, I would "assume" High Limit will not be resting on their current success or business model, and they would expand. The only other option is contract. They cannot stay the same, and the schedule, and model will change. What options are there? Add dates and tracks.
|
Egras, for sake of discussion (not argument), how would you classify the WoO? Not WRG, just their WoO arm. Are they they growing or contracting, and what evidence do you have?
Signature here.
|
|
|
September 22, 2024 at
02:53:58 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/15/2023
|
Posts:
|
136
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: armyduke on September 21 2024 at 09:45:11 AM
I'll type slower for ya. The MYTH that High limit drivers (d r i v e r s, not s e r i e s);are running less races is false and was always known it would be false. This is based on the FACT that the following drivers have entered the following number of 410 winged sprint car races prior to Friday night.
Gravel 59. Sweet 60
Macedo 62. Abreu 65
Schatz 60. Courtney 63
Kofoid 63. Marks 68
Scelzi 62. Day 67
So who is running less???? Now where I went to school, I learned the numbers on the right are not less than the numbers on the left.
Also reference hotels on the west coast swing. 30 nights out westwould be considered more than 17 nights, hopefully I typed slow enough for you to comprehend that.
I eagerly await your comments again denying those facts above even though it's the second time you have been educated on them.
You will still argue the facts though because your opinion is again proved false.
|
That is the point of HL. Freedom to race outside their series when they are not running, but still getting the benefits of running a series and still getting time off. Example, Brad Sweet only ran the 1st night of the Iron MAn and took the next night off. Many of these drivers have won just as much money racing outlaw races as full time regulars who are in the back of the point standings. Look at the team point standings on the outlaw website and it shows what each team has won. 12 of the 16 HL drivers rank in the top 30 for earnings and 13 have reached 6 figures so far (this will obviously change with more racing). With only 1 series only 1 driver/team is going to the top paying spot and only afew will get the rest. Now several driver/teams are going to get bigger end of the year payday.
|
|
|
|
September 22, 2024 at
02:55:57 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/15/2023
|
Posts:
|
136
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: HoldenCaulfield on September 21 2024 at 12:10:15 AM
I don't think flo gives a shit or sees it as any kind of loss if the high limit guys run elsewhere when they are off. Why would they? The series was started to give racers a lesser schedule with only high paying races, and time off to race where they want, or take the weekend off when they are not scheduled. It's not a loss at all. It's a win/win.
If it actually costs 4-5G to run weekly shows, there would be zero cars at the track. It's expensive for sure but lets not get ridiculous. Last credible numbers I've heard were around half that.
Donnie's been outlaw since what 1997? He's way up there in their record books for wins and championships and never broken ranks in 27 years. Gee I'm so shocked he didn't leave for high limit.
Here's an idea. Since none of us know shit about these teams and their finances, lets just let them choose which series to run. I'm sure they all know what is best for their teams.
|
Gary Kauffman said it cost his team 25K to run the entire PA speedweek. Whatever that means.
|
|
|
September 22, 2024 at
03:56:22 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/16/2009
|
Posts:
|
4212
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Jake B. on September 22 2024 at 12:55:44 PM
Egras, for sake of discussion (not argument), how would you classify the WoO? Not WRG, just their WoO arm. Are they they growing or contracting, and what evidence do you have?
|
I don't know how it's possible for me to have evidence, as I don't have access to their books. Just going by the eye test, there is a lot of evidence that the WoO have attempted to grow their business, and in many cases have succeeded. I know I'm not supposed to include WRG, Just the WoO arm, but let's be honest: Dirtvision was started to showcase the WoO sprint cars. It doesn't mean they invented streaming, nor does it mean they beat Flo to the punch. It does however, show they identified a need to get their product in the households interested in following the WoO before other sanctioning bodies were able to take their market. Has it been a huge success or profitable even? I have no evidence at all, but this is undoubtably an attempt to grow their business. Because it continues to stream WoO events, one could assume it is a profitable venture. ??
They have also been very good at identifying areas they can draw crowds, and avoiding areas where crowds are tough. In the areas they have had success drawing crowds, such as Beaver Dam and Wilmot (I've been to multiple events at both and the WoO crowds are always busting at the seams) they have had success in making deals for multi-day shows. They have also reported multiple record crowds at WoO events over the past 2 years. If you're someone that is sceptical since they are the ones reporting, that's fine. However, you can clearly see the crowds are standing room only at many events. This is also "evidence" of growing a business. I have not been to a WoO event over the past 5 years that hasn't been packed!
Full-time travelers with the WoO, contrary to popular belief, has been very strong over the past 10 years. The Platinum deal, although hated by many in the sprint car world, has done its job assuring their drivers would be at all shows when a WoO race was advertised. You don't have to look too far back in the history of the Outlaws to find years that 6 or 8 cars competed in all events. Look a little farther back, there are years where 3 or 4 competed in every event. This year, you should have 12. In recent years, they've held pretty steady around 10-14 cars. So, from where they were in the not so distant past, this is also evidence of growth.
If the High Limit wants to grow, they don't necessarily need to add events. Hell, they could even remove events. The main goal they will have over the next couple of years will be to take market share from the WoO. It has to be their goal. Their goal cannot simply be keep their market share. They have to try to take market share from the Outlaws, or they won't last. So, stay tuned. There will be less and less "freedom" given to drivers who want a share of the $$$ from the High Limit---and rightly so. It may not come in the form of not allowing them to race other events when off. It's going to come in the form of scheduling against other big events, with their own events, which is a way to keep your drivers running only your series.
The WoO has without a doubt made attempts to grow over the past decade, and in many areas has had tremendous success. I think that is pretty easy to see for someone who attends multiple WoO shows. For anyone who doesn't attend a WoO race, and simply reads the banter on social media, it's easy to pretty easy to be manipulated into believing the WoO is dying on the vine.
|
|
|
September 22, 2024 at
05:11:46 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
04/25/2017
|
Posts:
|
84
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on September 22 2024 at 03:56:22 PM
I don't know how it's possible for me to have evidence, as I don't have access to their books. Just going by the eye test, there is a lot of evidence that the WoO have attempted to grow their business, and in many cases have succeeded. I know I'm not supposed to include WRG, Just the WoO arm, but let's be honest: Dirtvision was started to showcase the WoO sprint cars. It doesn't mean they invented streaming, nor does it mean they beat Flo to the punch. It does however, show they identified a need to get their product in the households interested in following the WoO before other sanctioning bodies were able to take their market. Has it been a huge success or profitable even? I have no evidence at all, but this is undoubtably an attempt to grow their business. Because it continues to stream WoO events, one could assume it is a profitable venture. ??
They have also been very good at identifying areas they can draw crowds, and avoiding areas where crowds are tough. In the areas they have had success drawing crowds, such as Beaver Dam and Wilmot (I've been to multiple events at both and the WoO crowds are always busting at the seams) they have had success in making deals for multi-day shows. They have also reported multiple record crowds at WoO events over the past 2 years. If you're someone that is sceptical since they are the ones reporting, that's fine. However, you can clearly see the crowds are standing room only at many events. This is also "evidence" of growing a business. I have not been to a WoO event over the past 5 years that hasn't been packed!
Full-time travelers with the WoO, contrary to popular belief, has been very strong over the past 10 years. The Platinum deal, although hated by many in the sprint car world, has done its job assuring their drivers would be at all shows when a WoO race was advertised. You don't have to look too far back in the history of the Outlaws to find years that 6 or 8 cars competed in all events. Look a little farther back, there are years where 3 or 4 competed in every event. This year, you should have 12. In recent years, they've held pretty steady around 10-14 cars. So, from where they were in the not so distant past, this is also evidence of growth.
If the High Limit wants to grow, they don't necessarily need to add events. Hell, they could even remove events. The main goal they will have over the next couple of years will be to take market share from the WoO. It has to be their goal. Their goal cannot simply be keep their market share. They have to try to take market share from the Outlaws, or they won't last. So, stay tuned. There will be less and less "freedom" given to drivers who want a share of the $$$ from the High Limit---and rightly so. It may not come in the form of not allowing them to race other events when off. It's going to come in the form of scheduling against other big events, with their own events, which is a way to keep your drivers running only your series.
The WoO has without a doubt made attempts to grow over the past decade, and in many areas has had tremendous success. I think that is pretty easy to see for someone who attends multiple WoO shows. For anyone who doesn't attend a WoO race, and simply reads the banter on social media, it's easy to pretty easy to be manipulated into believing the WoO is dying on the vine.
|
Kudos have enjoyed,reading your posts on this topic and I agree with you regarding the growth aspect....not sure why it is so hard to understand and is not picking sides it is simply business. You are either moving forward or backward.
|
|
|
|
September 23, 2024 at
08:28:57 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/07/2006
|
Posts:
|
2585
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on September 22 2024 at 08:01:49 AM
The problem he has is diffentiating between fact and opinion. I'll give an example:
Opinion: Our favorite Hoser is an idiot. That would be an opinion.
Fact: 3 years ago I camped next to about 20 fans from PA that know Strawser and all 20 of them said he's a complete moron. Although their feelings for him would be an opinion, it was a fact that these folks told me what they thought of him
|
just curious as to why you are keeping score? seriously!
Ascot was the greatest of all time..
West Capital wasn't half bad either..
Life is good...
|
|
|
September 24, 2024 at
09:38:10 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
02/12/2017
|
Posts:
|
462
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on September 22 2024 at 03:56:22 PM
I don't know how it's possible for me to have evidence, as I don't have access to their books. Just going by the eye test, there is a lot of evidence that the WoO have attempted to grow their business, and in many cases have succeeded. I know I'm not supposed to include WRG, Just the WoO arm, but let's be honest: Dirtvision was started to showcase the WoO sprint cars. It doesn't mean they invented streaming, nor does it mean they beat Flo to the punch. It does however, show they identified a need to get their product in the households interested in following the WoO before other sanctioning bodies were able to take their market. Has it been a huge success or profitable even? I have no evidence at all, but this is undoubtably an attempt to grow their business. Because it continues to stream WoO events, one could assume it is a profitable venture. ??
They have also been very good at identifying areas they can draw crowds, and avoiding areas where crowds are tough. In the areas they have had success drawing crowds, such as Beaver Dam and Wilmot (I've been to multiple events at both and the WoO crowds are always busting at the seams) they have had success in making deals for multi-day shows. They have also reported multiple record crowds at WoO events over the past 2 years. If you're someone that is sceptical since they are the ones reporting, that's fine. However, you can clearly see the crowds are standing room only at many events. This is also "evidence" of growing a business. I have not been to a WoO event over the past 5 years that hasn't been packed!
Full-time travelers with the WoO, contrary to popular belief, has been very strong over the past 10 years. The Platinum deal, although hated by many in the sprint car world, has done its job assuring their drivers would be at all shows when a WoO race was advertised. You don't have to look too far back in the history of the Outlaws to find years that 6 or 8 cars competed in all events. Look a little farther back, there are years where 3 or 4 competed in every event. This year, you should have 12. In recent years, they've held pretty steady around 10-14 cars. So, from where they were in the not so distant past, this is also evidence of growth.
If the High Limit wants to grow, they don't necessarily need to add events. Hell, they could even remove events. The main goal they will have over the next couple of years will be to take market share from the WoO. It has to be their goal. Their goal cannot simply be keep their market share. They have to try to take market share from the Outlaws, or they won't last. So, stay tuned. There will be less and less "freedom" given to drivers who want a share of the $$$ from the High Limit---and rightly so. It may not come in the form of not allowing them to race other events when off. It's going to come in the form of scheduling against other big events, with their own events, which is a way to keep your drivers running only your series.
The WoO has without a doubt made attempts to grow over the past decade, and in many areas has had tremendous success. I think that is pretty easy to see for someone who attends multiple WoO shows. For anyone who doesn't attend a WoO race, and simply reads the banter on social media, it's easy to pretty easy to be manipulated into believing the WoO is dying on the vine.
|
“It's going to come in the form of scheduling against other big events, with their own events, which is a way to keep your drivers running only your series.”
So High Limit is going to schedule their own races at the same time as the Knoxville Nationals, Kings Royal, High Banks Hustle, and/or National Open. Is that what you are predicting ?
|
|
|
September 24, 2024 at
10:49:54 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/16/2009
|
Posts:
|
4212
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: onporch on September 24 2024 at 09:38:10 AM
“It's going to come in the form of scheduling against other big events, with their own events, which is a way to keep your drivers running only your series.”
So High Limit is going to schedule their own races at the same time as the Knoxville Nationals, Kings Royal, High Banks Hustle, and/or National Open. Is that what you are predicting ?
|
Not Knoxville Nats or King's Royal. However, I cannot see how they can continue to let the Outlaws have 70 cars in the 2 day June show at Knoxville. Tune up for Nats? Sure. Did it take away from their attendance at shows close to Knoxville in the weeks leading up to that Outlaw show? It did for me. I didn't bother going to see them nearby because it was made well known they would all be in Knoxville in June. That cannot continue to happen. They cannot continue to take a month off while Outlaw shows bust at the seams.
As far as any other events considered "crown jewels" they are going to have to make a choice. Create their own crown jewels, steal away these crown jewels as High Limit events, schedule something against them to mandate their drivers stick with their series, or continue to feed cars and attendance at Outlaw shows.
Which one is it? If they're going with choice 4, this should be a short lived series.
|
|
|
|
September 24, 2024 at
01:48:28 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
06/04/2012
|
Posts:
|
1791
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on September 24 2024 at 10:49:54 AM
Not Knoxville Nats or King's Royal. However, I cannot see how they can continue to let the Outlaws have 70 cars in the 2 day June show at Knoxville. Tune up for Nats? Sure. Did it take away from their attendance at shows close to Knoxville in the weeks leading up to that Outlaw show? It did for me. I didn't bother going to see them nearby because it was made well known they would all be in Knoxville in June. That cannot continue to happen. They cannot continue to take a month off while Outlaw shows bust at the seams.
As far as any other events considered "crown jewels" they are going to have to make a choice. Create their own crown jewels, steal away these crown jewels as High Limit events, schedule something against them to mandate their drivers stick with their series, or continue to feed cars and attendance at Outlaw shows.
Which one is it? If they're going with choice 4, this should be a short lived series.
|
They will have to eventually have to change their model at some point. How soon, who knows? I think the way they have it now is more of a means to exist. I don't think anyone starting up a series can have drivers signed to exclusively race with a new series and not with the Outlaws. Its a good promotional perk that they may have currently that gets brownie points with a few fans and maybe teams but realistically, some tough decisions will need to be made. Logistically I think they did a good job for the most part to make sure for a majority of the year they were at different parts of the country or far enough to where no one competitor wise had to make hard decisions. Eldora $100k race was pretty much a known race all of the Outlaws would do and a few mid week shows some teams picked and choose. HL wise like you said why would you spend money for a midweek show when you are going to see all of them and Outlaws in a few days, unless you wanted to make a week out of it.
We won't know what perks each series gives the other drivers as far as Tow and contingency money. Travel wise when you add in HL regular shows, add in the Outlaw shows, you are pretty much traveling the same amount of miles, spending the same in tires, hotels, etc. Unless you are simply doing the HL schedule itself without the big races which i doubt any of them did. I think this is the area where the Outlaws might be able to give an edge to the teams and in the past has been the reason why they could demand exclusivity from the teams. Its already costly enough doing this but if you say you will give me money for me to two, pit passes, maybe some other discounts, and I am racing for at least $12,000 a night, plus multiple 20-250+ to win races and 2000+ to start events, plus a point fund then maybe I really do not need to race that 1-2 $20,000 to win race that is 500miles away.
I think they did good in creating a baseline of some crown jewel races for themselves but it will be interesting in how they improve upon them. It will be interesting when the schedules for next year come out
|
|
|
September 24, 2024 at
08:18:39 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/15/2023
|
Posts:
|
136
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on September 24 2024 at 10:49:54 AM
Not Knoxville Nats or King's Royal. However, I cannot see how they can continue to let the Outlaws have 70 cars in the 2 day June show at Knoxville. Tune up for Nats? Sure. Did it take away from their attendance at shows close to Knoxville in the weeks leading up to that Outlaw show? It did for me. I didn't bother going to see them nearby because it was made well known they would all be in Knoxville in June. That cannot continue to happen. They cannot continue to take a month off while Outlaw shows bust at the seams.
As far as any other events considered "crown jewels" they are going to have to make a choice. Create their own crown jewels, steal away these crown jewels as High Limit events, schedule something against them to mandate their drivers stick with their series, or continue to feed cars and attendance at Outlaw shows.
Which one is it? If they're going with choice 4, this should be a short lived series.
|
It didn't make a difference to me. I went to several of the shows before and after the June Knoxville races. (I went to them too). To me it is about the quality of the product a series is putting on the track. I think part of HL growing its brand is running well against and beating the Outlaws every chance they get. They have done that. I have heard Brad talk about his vision of the series and where he would like to see it in 5 to 10 years. I am going to trust the process and give them the benefit of the doubt for now. It appears to me they are growing the sport, but like anything it will evolve. They already have a 100k to win race in Australia under the HL banner and probably a few more to come. As a latemodel guy, I have really enjoyed sprint car racing this year.
|
|
|
September 24, 2024 at
08:29:35 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/15/2023
|
Posts:
|
136
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: BStrawser26 on September 19 2024 at 01:18:31 PM
I think you will find they will continue to let their drivers run the big shows that are not HL races in the future. That is what they want to do run all the HL big shows as well as
many of the Woo Big shows.. that way they can run for big money more often. I don't see that changing anytime soon.
|
I agree that is one of their big selling points. I don't see any reason to change it. I think a lot of people are missing the point and that was the need for 2 national tours. Neither the Outlaws or HL are set up to sustain 20+ touring teams. 12 to 15 is realistic per series. I heard HL set their series up for 14. They started with 17 and kept 16 which I have to admit I did not expect. 28 national touring teams toatl wow. The latemodels have 32
|
|
|
|
September 24, 2024 at
09:01:42 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/26/2005
|
Posts:
|
3532
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Latemodel1 on September 24 2024 at 08:29:35 PM
I agree that is one of their big selling points. I don't see any reason to change it. I think a lot of people are missing the point and that was the need for 2 national tours. Neither the Outlaws or HL are set up to sustain 20+ touring teams. 12 to 15 is realistic per series. I heard HL set their series up for 14. They started with 17 and kept 16 which I have to admit I did not expect. 28 national touring teams toatl wow. The latemodels have 32
|
I'm curious. Do the two top shelf late model organizations schedule against each other's big races?
|
|
|
September 25, 2024 at
09:32:45 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
10/19/2023
|
Posts:
|
56
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Murphy on September 24 2024 at 09:01:42 PM
I'm curious. Do the two top shelf late model organizations schedule against each other's big races?
|
No
The only one I see is Lucas has show me 100 and WOO was in Carolina, other than that they work together
|
|
|