|
|
|
|
|
Topic: ASCS NP @ Jackson Results
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
|
Page 2 of 2 of 27 replies
|
|
|
|
August 20, 2007 at
08:58:19 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/08/2006
|
|
Posts:
|
537
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: neilstevens2 on August 20 2007 at 09:06:15 AM
the reason i wonder is because i heard that this was a new way of checking the heads that found the ports too big. a tool made so that its not supposed to have room to move around in there. and it was definitely able to move so that made it illegal. just what i heard. cz could pry clarify that. as far as the cheating my bet is that ascs will continue to find ways to catch all that cheat. they are good people that have worked hard to put this deal together. they've been around the block alot of times and it shows cuz they're drawing cars and people. we're lucky to have ascs!
|
from what i heard from a car owner was that the ascs letters or numbers were nott stamped on the heads. if this is the case why did he even get to run the show. as for the week before i am not sure of jacksons rules erses jacksons but i thought they were supposed to be the same or close to the same.
this happened how many times at knoxville and now in jackson. i would say the ascs should take a stand and do as nascar does points and money that would stop the cheating.
heck if i raced and cheated and got caught i would lose my motor that is my luck.
i know of one car earlier this year the jackson officials made them change headers because they were to long or something. this was pointed out by mr weseman. now he is not even a tech man at jackson so tell me what is fair and what is not
|
|
|
|
|
August 20, 2007 at
09:06:30 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
02/22/2007
|
|
Posts:
|
24
|
|
|
|
remember back in the early 90s when terry reilly ran imca .did lanman and motorman pit for terry. they to were accused og cheatting to go figure there ffrom watertown sd end of story
|
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2007 at
10:22:57 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/04/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
13
|
|
|
This message was edited on
August 21, 2007 at
10:26:14 AM by motorman
dude83 when were we ever accused of cheating, the only thing we did is refuse the claim. The only rule IMCA really has is you must be 360 ci. I did own that motor and i was the one who refused the claim because i had no other heads and we had to race hussets the next two days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 21, 2007 at
09:48:25 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/02/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
4
|
|
|
|
why would you guys race if you guys would refuse the claim thats why they had the rules to keep the cheaters out and you guys are back at it again sorry not trying to make anybody mad but thats what rules are for.if you break the rules i would think that would counsider you guys as a team cheaters.
|
|
|
|
|
August 22, 2007 at
08:11:58 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/02/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
75
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: NEWMAN on August 21 2007 at 09:48:25 PM
why would you guys race if you guys would refuse the claim thats why they had the rules to keep the cheaters out and you guys are back at it again sorry not trying to make anybody mad but thats what rules are for.if you break the rules i would think that would counsider you guys as a team cheaters.
|
The I.M.C.A. rules address claiming, and refusing a claim. Please tell me at what point does refusing a claim break any rules or cause you to be cheating.
|
|
|
|
|
August 22, 2007 at
03:36:22 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/04/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
120
|
|
|
Motorman- I'd like to know how you even refused the claim on a car driven by Terry Reilly- The rules state that only the driver can refuse or accept a claim- this put Terrys IMCA status with IMCA in Jeopardy by refusing the claim. I believe its a bunch of Bull S--- that you refused because of not having more heads to bolt on- They sell them all over. Terry is an excellent driver and I am sure all the IMCA guys will agree that he was tough to beat when he raced against them-But you took that away from him by instructing him to not sell if he was claimed- You knew the rules.Sign me sceptical on this one! Pat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 22, 2007 at
08:21:22 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/04/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
13
|
|
|
|
Well i guess you better ask arlington officials why they let him come back to the trailor and find out what we wanted to do. We had to race husets the next two days so we didnt sell. I do know the rules and they say you have the option of accepting the claim or not. I guess if not accepting the claim is cheating then we cheated. The thing is i really dont care what you guys want to call it, its over with and its not bothering me, but the way it looks its bothering alot of other people, why i have no idea.
|
|
|
|
|
August 22, 2007 at
08:29:44 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/04/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
120
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply- been there too- it was the driver that refused the claim in our case- we paid the fine and came back- Pat
|
|
|
