|
|
|
|
|
Topic: What is the difference between a 2000 and a 2012 Maxim for non-wing use?
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
|
Page 1 of 1 of 2 replies
|
|
|
|
|
September 10, 2013 at
06:08:33 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
09/10/2013
|
|
Posts:
|
4
|
|
|
|
The title is really my question. From a detail or just functional point of view, what is the difference in performance that can be expected from an old car like a 2000 vs. a very late. The conditions are 1/5 to 1/4 mile dirt, 360 engine, non-wing. Would not the set up including shocks dominate the equation?
Thanks very much for your thoughts.
John
|
|
|
|
September 11, 2013 at
12:15:20 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
09/02/2009
|
|
Posts:
|
454
|
|
|
|
If the old chassis is straight and you get the right set-up under it you won't see a nickles bit of difference in the 2 frames in your application.
Loose is when you hit the wall with the rear of the
car, tight is when you hit the wall with the front of
the car. Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall and
torque is how far you move the wall.
|
|
|
|
|
September 12, 2013 at
05:36:17 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
09/10/2013
|
|
Posts:
|
4
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: darnall on September 11 2013 at 12:15:20 PM
If the old chassis is straight and you get the right set-up under it you won't see a nickles bit of difference in the 2 frames in your application.
|
Thanks for the answer darnall. As I expected.
|
|
|
