I understand your point entirely... I still think there is more to putting on a show than the purse.
(I'm really not speaking about Attica in the following comments, moreso racing in general. I don't know if the track is private or city-owned, on municipal property, etc.)
Fuel, for example, is probably 20-30 cents higher today than it was a few months back here in my area (North Texas). The track equipment burns fuel.
Employees cost money. Most won't work for no raise year after year.
Property taxes, advertising rates, insurance... a million things could cost the promoter more money today than yesterday.
ALSO... it isn't illegal to profit from promoting races. What if the promoter wants to make money? They're the one sticking their neck out there quite often with their own money.
I'm by no means a guy that thinks purses are in line with the expenses racers put into their programs. Talking about financial matters with teams that "need" a 53' trailer and Mule with $4k in upgrades to race... it makes no sense.
I'm by no means a friend/apologist/defender of the promoter or track owner.
I'm a racing fan.
Revenue sharing in pro sports is why you have strikes. Seems like no sport exists where the participants think they get their fair share. Everyone is mad at the other guy for making $$$. Call it a sport... its a business first and foremost (especially NFL, NBA, etc.).
If a promoter doesn't do things as you want them to... don't go to their races. Don't race at their tracks. Rent or buy a track and do it better. Pay the big bucks. That has happened more than once. In Eckert's column this week it mentions the story of Battleground Speedway in Houston... disgruntled car owners doing it their way down the road.
I'm so ready for the weekend LOLOL
|