HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Midgets at the Tulsa Shootout Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 1   of  11 replies
Photo Jim
January 05, 2010 at 11:00:01 AM
Joined: 08/08/2008
Posts: 321
Reply

ECOTech Chevy / Ford Focus Midgets at the Tulsa Shootout


Gary Taylor

Bryan Clauson

Kevin Bayer - Winner

Kevin Ramey and Tyler Thomas

Scott Sawyer in traffic.




Openwheel
MyWebsite
January 05, 2010 at 11:08:56 AM
Joined: 11/27/2006
Posts: 85
Reply

How many were there of each? Eco-tech and Ford focus. Which seemed to perform the best on the track? Lap times compared to the non-winged 600's? Overall evaluation?



darnall
January 05, 2010 at 12:26:59 PM
Joined: 09/02/2009
Posts: 454
Reply

I wonder how good the 99 car ran with the stacks and filters laying down in the nerf bar....


Loose is when you hit the wall with the rear of the
car, tight is when you hit the wall with the front of
the car. Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall and
torque is how far you move the wall.


cheroger
January 05, 2010 at 12:40:21 PM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 1033
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: darnall on January 05 2010 at 12:26:59 PM

I wonder how good the 99 car ran with the stacks and filters laying down in the nerf bar....



Great observation! It would probably run good until it sucked a dirt clog.



Sprint50
January 05, 2010 at 01:31:26 PM
Joined: 01/30/2008
Posts: 543
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Openwheel on January 05 2010 at 11:08:56 AM

How many were there of each? Eco-tech and Ford focus. Which seemed to perform the best on the track? Lap times compared to the non-winged 600's? Overall evaluation?



There were 13 of the Eco-techs and 2 of the Ford Focus. Eco-techs seemed faster than the Focus but slower than the non winged 600s. My evaluation is that on a small track they would be great but boring on a big track. Heard that the Smiley 84 car that was driven by Gary Taylor also has an Esslinger for the Chili Bowl



Openwheel
MyWebsite
January 05, 2010 at 01:46:19 PM
Joined: 11/27/2006
Posts: 85
Reply

Thanks Sprint50.

The dislodged stacks and filters? Saw that but figured the proverbial "Don't own it, don't care" rule applies.

Are these ECOtechs the second coming? I'm confused......I thought the Ford Focus deal was supposed to be.




Some Guy In Texas
January 05, 2010 at 02:37:02 PM
Joined: 08/09/2008
Posts: 500
Reply

There was an article in SC&M magazine about the Ecotech midgets.

As I recall the guy behind the Focus program, USAC & Ford had a falling out.

He went with a new program and ASCS appears to be involved.

Ecotech has more power if comparing stock Focus midget motor to stock Ecotech motor but there was talk of a coversion package to make the Forcus engine competitive.

The Focus is a little light on power but a great training ground. I've never owned a competitive minisprint but it appears there are a kajillion of them around despite what can be fairly pricey motors, etc. The Focus/Ecotech motors are sealed and you don't mess with them... which has a little initial cost but in the long run is supposed to keep the playing ground level and economical. If you can't change internals... that HAS to help the cost.

As far as winged 600s being faster than a roughly 200hp non-winged midget... I would imagine so. Winged minis aren't slow!



Openwheel
MyWebsite
January 05, 2010 at 03:27:38 PM
Joined: 11/27/2006
Posts: 85
Reply

Read the same article. If I remember right...around 250hp? What concerns me is the tampering with the ECU (Computer/management system for the fuel system and ignition). Those can be altered rather easily for a nominal fee. That changes the characteristics of the motor performance. It has been done with similar systems being used in the 600 micros and 1200 minis. The gooks have been "adjusting" the ECU units of their bike motors for the past view years only with very little mechanical modifications and gained quite a bit of performance so has been proven it can have a profound effect.

Band wagon time.......There's a 1200 class out there with the same sized car and wheels but runs a $1,500-$2,000 stock bike motor (1000cc @ 188hp. Total car weight around 690#) that is competitive with the current full midgets on small 3/8ths mile and smaller tracks. The class runs winged and non-winged. The bad thing....It incorporates the "sacreligious chain drive" rather than a drive shaft. OMG! No doubt faster than this new car/ford focus at a fraction of the cost. Isn't that what this is supposed to be about?



dmonahan
January 05, 2010 at 04:29:05 PM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 82
Reply

I attended some races last year at which there were about 20 NEMA Midgets and 20 NEMA Lites. The midgets use the common, expensive midget engines. The Lites are the remainder of the Eastern Ford Focus group. They run a number of engines, but are mostly Focus and Pontiac 4s. They run separate events. The Lites are only slightly slower than the full midgets, and it's not particularly noticeable from the stands, if they don't run right after each other. I don't have the times handy, but the Lites are running times that the full midgets were running a few years ago. BTW, both series run wings.

Those Pontiac engines come from a group that runs Whip City Speedway. They way they handle the possibility of owners fooling with the electronics is simple. When you go home, you leave the computer with the officials. When you get there next week, you get any one of the computers out of the box.





tjelwood14
January 05, 2010 at 04:52:36 PM
Joined: 10/08/2006
Posts: 74
Reply
The ecotech cars were way faster than the focus cars. I timed Kevin Bayer and Gary Taylor on the stop watch and they were both running low to mid 12 second laps. It was a good race as Taylor was running down Bayer. I didn't think about timing the non wing 600s but Donnie Ray was running laps in the mid elevens in his a class wing car.

muddy waters
January 06, 2010 at 10:18:59 AM
Joined: 08/08/2005
Posts: 55
Reply

Thanks for the Photos Jim. Happy New Year to All!



slide22
January 06, 2010 at 11:49:40 AM
Joined: 05/31/2009
Posts: 22
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Openwheel on January 05 2010 at 03:27:38 PM

Read the same article. If I remember right...around 250hp? What concerns me is the tampering with the ECU (Computer/management system for the fuel system and ignition). Those can be altered rather easily for a nominal fee. That changes the characteristics of the motor performance. It has been done with similar systems being used in the 600 micros and 1200 minis. The gooks have been "adjusting" the ECU units of their bike motors for the past view years only with very little mechanical modifications and gained quite a bit of performance so has been proven it can have a profound effect.

Band wagon time.......There's a 1200 class out there with the same sized car and wheels but runs a $1,500-$2,000 stock bike motor (1000cc @ 188hp. Total car weight around 690#) that is competitive with the current full midgets on small 3/8ths mile and smaller tracks. The class runs winged and non-winged. The bad thing....It incorporates the "sacreligious chain drive" rather than a drive shaft. OMG! No doubt faster than this new car/ford focus at a fraction of the cost. Isn't that what this is supposed to be about?



I suggested on IOW letting 1000cc mini sprints (non-wing,) run with the focus cars and Ecotech cars and got the typical OMG!!!! No drive shaft!!! response.

Would help the Focus series in Indiana with car counts, seeing as they're only getting 6-8 cars a race.





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy