HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Badlands Farm Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 2 of 9   of  161 replies
blazer00
June 12, 2018 at 08:49:23 PM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: IADIRT on June 12 2018 at 02:47:49 PM

I don't disagree and have seen pictures as well but according to satellite the track sits no lower than the field farmed to the SW. Whether farmed or just pasture/hay field its not going for 500 an acre. Heck people who live in the bigger cities are buying more and more junk ground to make into hunting properties driving the costs way up. Timber ground here in Southern Iowa will bring way more than 500 an acre.



I don't know about any satellite image, but looking at the picture that was posted on this thread it sure looks green and dry back on the other side of the river.



Murphy
June 12, 2018 at 09:34:37 PM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3309
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: leadfoot23 on June 12 2018 at 04:49:44 AM

Ponder this...city rezones track; track loses value; city buys track for a fraction of what ole Chuck thinks it’s worth; track becomes a fairgrounds after it’s rezoned back to a racing venue...

When I first read this thread I was thinking the track is gone.  But the comments from the mayor (from Rodin Canada’s post) makes me think they might just have the cajones to pull something like this off.  Even if they don’t, it’s an interesting conversation topic. 



     OK. I've pondered it. Your theory has more holes in it than a garden variety JFK conspiracy theory.

     The track is not in the city of Brandon. It is just south of town. The track is in Minnehaha County. It is Minnehaha County zoning that has jurisdiction and that's who sent the letter. That's who is addressing the zoning issue. Now, I know what you're thinking...the county is behind the plot. Well, Minnehaha County already has a fairgrounds. It had a racetrack for probably 50 years but the county made it a parking lot and uses the grandstands for concerts during the fair.

ps. if the city or county tried what you're talking about, I think it would keep enough lawyers busy to keep the phone book companies in business longer selling back cover ads.



Murphy
June 12, 2018 at 09:39:19 PM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3309
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: RodinCanada on June 11 2018 at 11:15:14 PM

Seems like all he needed to do was host one race earlier this summer to buy himself another 364 days as a race track. If it was as "turn key" as they said it should have been easy. 

Saw an interview with the Mayor speaking how wonderful it was for the community to have the track in operation. Makes me wonder if he was sincere or not and wonder how easy the county and community would be to work with if the track is really a huge asset to their economy.



   I'd say it is an important economic factor in the city of Brandon. However, not everyone there likes having a race track as a neighbor. What's needed is someone to run the track that can effectively deal with the community issues involved. 




3togo
June 12, 2018 at 10:18:18 PM
Joined: 06/14/2016
Posts: 492
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Murphy on June 12 2018 at 09:39:19 PM

   I'd say it is an important economic factor in the city of Brandon. However, not everyone there likes having a race track as a neighbor. What's needed is someone to run the track that can effectively deal with the community issues involved. 



WHO?



IADIRT
June 12, 2018 at 10:26:11 PM
Joined: 04/29/2014
Posts: 1206
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: blazer00 on June 12 2018 at 08:49:23 PM

I don't know about any satellite image, but looking at the picture that was posted on this thread it sure looks green and dry back on the other side of the river.



The field you are referring to is straight East. The one I am referring to is SW. You can measure elevations above sea level with Google Earth. I do it for my job daily. Anyhow it's not really the point or worth arguing about. 500 dollars an acre is a severe underestimation of land value in the Midwest. The original 3000 was much closer. That's all I'm saying. Hope it becomes a functioning track soon. It is a sad point where we are at now for all of us midwestern fans who don't need another track to shut its doors.



RHC
June 12, 2018 at 10:33:14 PM
Joined: 12/07/2004
Posts: 443
Reply
This message was edited on June 12, 2018 at 10:38:40 PM by RHC

Looks like Chucky has three options for the Speedway.  He can appeal the decision to the planning board of adjustment, file for a conditional use permit or sell the property as agriculture land.

http://www.keloland.com/news/article/news/badlands-motor-speedway-for-and-against

 




hardon
June 13, 2018 at 12:48:48 AM
Joined: 02/20/2005
Posts: 486
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: madsen on June 12 2018 at 07:56:00 AM

It means nothing.  The local governing body will obviously allow a permit again.  Its economic development.  Stupid to think just because the permit ran out they can't get another.  Lawyers would be drooling to take this case if it came to something so rediculous as to not allow a permit.  

Also, pasture land worth $3,000 an acre?  As someone who has been around farming all his life, you can buy land useful for only pasture, anyplace in the midwest for $500 an acre.  

 



I wouldn't say anything's a slam dunk here.  I'm not a lawyer, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.  But I'm not sure what lawyers would be drooling over here.  Simple fact of the matter is there was an agreement, host at least one race a year or else the land is to be used only for agricultural purposes.  No races were hosted in a year and now they are saying it's only to be used for agricultural purposes unless a conditional is reissued.  What's the legal ramifications?  They are doing exactly what they said they would do if races weren't held there.  An agreement that was agreed upon by both parties.  I'm sure there is more to the story but I'm not sure what lawyers will be drooling over.



Murphy
June 13, 2018 at 07:12:20 AM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3309
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: 3togo on June 12 2018 at 10:18:18 PM

WHO?



     The quoting function here is a little wonky. 3togo is replying to my post below:
"What's needed is someone to run the track that can effectively deal with the community issues involved."



     I don't know who that person is. By the process of elimination, I know of one person who probably would not be on that list.



Murphy
June 13, 2018 at 07:17:49 AM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3309
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: RHC on June 12 2018 at 03:11:58 PM

I believe you are referring to the Husets flood from June, 2014
Related image



     I think that's the 3rd time I can remember it flooding out, although admitedly it only happens about every 10 years or so.

     I feel that Chuck has so messed up (killed) local racing around Sioux Falls that we are now reduced to debating the relative value of flood-prone farmland. Before anybody jumps the gun, I don't think Chuck would make a very good farmer either.




dsc1600
June 13, 2018 at 08:15:32 AM
Joined: 05/31/2007
Posts: 4390
Reply

Whatever you want to say about SuperChuck, he spent a bunch of money on that place and it’s not your usual local race track eyesore. There’s probably a compromise here where whomever the new owners are can operate 6-10 times per year with specials. Given the internet message board rule that no track within 350 Miles of Knoxville can operate a track that races sprintson the same night, the only other option is Sunday’s, which is a dead night for entertainment and probably would ensure failure.



kooks
June 13, 2018 at 08:29:41 AM
Joined: 02/27/2008
Posts: 702
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: dsc1600 on June 13 2018 at 08:15:32 AM

Whatever you want to say about SuperChuck, he spent a bunch of money on that place and it’s not your usual local race track eyesore. There’s probably a compromise here where whomever the new owners are can operate 6-10 times per year with specials. Given the internet message board rule that no track within 350 Miles of Knoxville can operate a track that races sprintson the same night, the only other option is Sunday’s, which is a dead night for entertainment and probably would ensure failure.



For all of their shortcomings, the Rubins managed to sucessfully operate that track on Sunday night for 30 yrs and the new owner closed it down after a little more than a year of racing on Saturday night.

 

That would lead one to believe that racing on Sunday night isn't and never was a problem.    All you need to do is start on time and run a fast efficient program that can reliably be done between 10 and 10:30



madsen
June 13, 2018 at 09:02:34 AM
Joined: 10/09/2010
Posts: 404
Reply

Pasture land $500 an acre?  For those who can't read, my post said "land that can be used only for pasture land is worth no more than $500". Only for pasture land and nothing else as thats what a post prior to mine said, that it was land good for pasture land only.   Sure if its zoned for residential and someone wants to live in lowland next to a creek that might flood, and people build houses on it, its certainlly worth more than $500 an acre.  Possibly more than $3,000 an acre.  Maybe a lot more.  Take it a few steps further, say the government wants to build a radar base there or some type of military installation there (if creek route is changed by man), what the hell, it might be worth  a million dollars--the sky is the limit.  BUT, it said, "can be used ONLY for pasture land, then $500 an acre is about it.  Maybe there is a gold mine under the ground.  Millions an acre?  How far do you want to take the guesswork.

Forget about that, its never ever going to be used for pasture land, not in our lifetime or the next.  


 Lawlessness and liberalism equals Hell.  NY City, 
Detroit, Seattle, Chicago, Minnepolis, etc. We saw it. 
Burning hundreds of buildings, a thousand assaults and 
dozens of murders. Getting worser and worser.


bevfox08
June 13, 2018 at 09:26:59 AM
Joined: 06/05/2008
Posts: 10
Reply

People who buy a house next to a race track them bitch about the noise are really stupid.  Chuck dropped the ball and now the Everybody associated with racing in the area are screwed.



StanM
MyResults MyPressRelease
June 13, 2018 at 10:12:36 AM
Joined: 11/07/2006
Posts: 5580
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: bevfox08 on June 13 2018 at 09:26:59 AM

People who buy a house next to a race track them bitch about the noise are really stupid.  Chuck dropped the ball and now the Everybody associated with racing in the area are screwed.



Unfortunately in the majority of cases they end up being the winners.  I kind of see their point.  I have been going to races for over 50 years but wouldn't want to live next to a track.  We are mostly residential but had a business that grinds scrap concrete on a big conveyor.  I have a home music studio and couldn't use it on week days.  I never knew it was there until I moved in back in 1997 until we heard it.  They shut it down and it makes a big difference when I can sit on my deck without ear plugs.  


Stan Meissner

Schreurs12
June 13, 2018 at 10:13:27 AM
Joined: 04/11/2017
Posts: 35
Reply
This message was edited on June 13, 2018 at 10:15:03 AM by Schreurs12

I dont think we are necessarily screwed. The track needs a conditional use permit to operate. To some this sounds like trying ride a bottle rocket to the moon and it cannot and will not ever be done. I have a hard time believing they wont get some sort of permit to operate. There are plenty of well informed people here pleading our case to the powers that be and they are doing a great job. Races will happen there again. This is nothing more than ironing out the legalities of it. 

And whoever thinks Sundays wont work I feel couldnt be more wrong. It ran successfully on Sundays for as long as anyone can remember. Put the Husets name back on it and run on Sunday nights and I bet a shiny nickel says that place is packed if its run correctly.




Murphy
June 13, 2018 at 10:38:50 AM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3309
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: bevfox08 on June 13 2018 at 09:26:59 AM

People who buy a house next to a race track them bitch about the noise are really stupid.  Chuck dropped the ball and now the Everybody associated with racing in the area are screwed.



    I guess I'm more optimistic than you are about this. Yes, Chuck dropped the ball. I think we can agree to agree on that aspect.

     The lady that is quoted in the Argus didn't sound like she totally against the track reopening. She sounded like she thought the track needed to work on things like noise. I have friends who live in Brandon who are not race fans. Their issues are: noise, late nights, dust and traffic. It's reasonable that any non-racefan would have similar concerns. Those are challenges to be worked out, not neccesarily deal killers.



Murphy
June 13, 2018 at 10:43:01 AM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3309
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: dsc1600 on June 13 2018 at 08:15:32 AM

Whatever you want to say about SuperChuck, he spent a bunch of money on that place and it’s not your usual local race track eyesore. There’s probably a compromise here where whomever the new owners are can operate 6-10 times per year with specials. Given the internet message board rule that no track within 350 Miles of Knoxville can operate a track that races sprintson the same night, the only other option is Sunday’s, which is a dead night for entertainment and probably would ensure failure.



     I think Sunday nights could work. Figure out what made it work for nearly 50 years and improve on that.



team1hd
MyWebsite
June 13, 2018 at 10:54:44 AM
Joined: 01/10/2012
Posts: 59
Reply

Tired of the drama with this place. I am about to the point i could care less if they turn it into testing range for the SD Air National Guard and their F-15 Squadron. And i have been going to races there since the 1970’s... 




Dryslick Willie
June 13, 2018 at 11:04:00 AM
Joined: 12/17/2009
Posts: 2249
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: bevfox08 on June 13 2018 at 09:26:59 AM

People who buy a house next to a race track them bitch about the noise are really stupid.  Chuck dropped the ball and now the Everybody associated with racing in the area are screwed.



I agree totally with your assessment of the people who buy houses next to racetracks.    It's not just racetracks though.   I had a co-worker years ago that bought a house close to D/FW Airport and was the leader of a group of people who went and complained about the noise from the airplanes.   I'm surprised racetracks aren't more proactive to limit noise before it becomes a problem and someone forces them to.   



Murphy
June 13, 2018 at 11:31:13 AM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3309
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: team1hd on June 13 2018 at 10:54:44 AM

Tired of the drama with this place. I am about to the point i could care less if they turn it into testing range for the SD Air National Guard and their F-15 Squadron. And i have been going to races there since the 1970’s... 



Some neighbors would probably have a problem with that. How much of a problem would depend on their aim I suppose.





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy