HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Knoxville Nationals Friday Format change. Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 2   of  22 replies
rcmkm
May 15, 2012 at 05:50:06 PM
Joined: 02/01/2007
Posts: 143
Reply
This message was edited on May 15, 2012 at 05:51:25 PM by rcmkm

Does anyone know how it exactly works? I understand the top 16 in points from Wed / Thur are locked into the A main on Saturday and the top 4 from Fridays main transfer to spots 17-20 however after that im a little lost. Do they go on combined points or best nights points on how everyone will lineup on Saturday? Much THX.




Fuelstick
May 15, 2012 at 08:16:53 PM
Joined: 09/24/2011
Posts: 198
Reply

After Thursday night qualifying the points are tallied up from both Wed & Thurs qualifiers. The top 16 in points are locked into sat nites A Main. The next 10 in points that would be filling the 1st ten spots in Sat nights B Main,get the option of racing Frid night.However,if they choose that option,they FORFIET the chance of starting in the 1st 10 spots of the B Main on Sat night & can start no better than 11th in Sat nights B main! If they finish in the top 4 in Fri nights A Main they will fill the spots 17 to 20 in Sat nights A Main.

This option is ONLY for the drivers who are 17th to 26th in points after both qualifying nights.

All the drivers outsdie that next 10 in points,its pretty much just a 2nd chance to try & qualify again!

Also that option given to the "next 10 in points" must decide after the points are tallied up after thurday night, on the spot!



zerorules
May 16, 2012 at 06:45:56 AM
Joined: 09/01/2011
Posts: 77
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Fuelstick on May 15 2012 at 08:16:53 PM

After Thursday night qualifying the points are tallied up from both Wed & Thurs qualifiers. The top 16 in points are locked into sat nites A Main. The next 10 in points that would be filling the 1st ten spots in Sat nights B Main,get the option of racing Frid night.However,if they choose that option,they FORFIET the chance of starting in the 1st 10 spots of the B Main on Sat night & can start no better than 11th in Sat nights B main! If they finish in the top 4 in Fri nights A Main they will fill the spots 17 to 20 in Sat nights A Main.

This option is ONLY for the drivers who are 17th to 26th in points after both qualifying nights.

All the drivers outsdie that next 10 in points,its pretty much just a 2nd chance to try & qualify again!

Also that option given to the "next 10 in points" must decide after the points are tallied up after thurday night, on the spot!



Go back to old way 4 heats and c,b,a,mains. On wendsday & Thursday take top 24 in a main each night wendsday inside row & Thursday outside row or vice a versis . If you make the a main on wed.& Thursday you do not run on friday. The new way makes it easyer for the outlaws that are not in a main to get in and not have to run c or b mains.


zerorules
May 16, 2012 at 07:08:18 AM
Joined: 09/01/2011
Posts: 77
Reply
Give the little guys a chance to make some good money.and go back to inverting all ten in heats not 6 or 8 . Satrday nights a main 40 laps no fuel stops or tire stops.33 gallon tanks hard tires. All tires should ne bought from the local dealer & one else so everyone gets the same tire.

vande77
May 16, 2012 at 10:12:11 AM
Joined: 01/20/2005
Posts: 2079
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Fuelstick on May 15 2012 at 08:16:53 PM

After Thursday night qualifying the points are tallied up from both Wed & Thurs qualifiers. The top 16 in points are locked into sat nites A Main. The next 10 in points that would be filling the 1st ten spots in Sat nights B Main,get the option of racing Frid night.However,if they choose that option,they FORFIET the chance of starting in the 1st 10 spots of the B Main on Sat night & can start no better than 11th in Sat nights B main! If they finish in the top 4 in Fri nights A Main they will fill the spots 17 to 20 in Sat nights A Main.

This option is ONLY for the drivers who are 17th to 26th in points after both qualifying nights.

All the drivers outsdie that next 10 in points,its pretty much just a 2nd chance to try & qualify again!

Also that option given to the "next 10 in points" must decide after the points are tallied up after thurday night, on the spot!



I have heard that the option is for everyone, if someone decides to forego their points and run Friday (17th through 26th points position), the next guy in line gets to choose the Top 10 Start in the B or to run Friday.

I personally don't see anyone in position 17-26 foregoing their points.

In my OPINION, this is a bad move overall for the competitors (but the FANS have packed up and gone home on Friday nights in years past because their weren't big enough NAMES running on Friday, so they added the scrambles (and FANS still complained that they thought they were dumb), so they added the World Challenge and last year the Race of Champions (so called FANS still complained), so now the format change to this year.

IMO, we should just go to 3 qualifying nights and break the field up more and FULLY INVERT the heats again. If 100 cars are there, you only are gonna have 33 cars per night though and 3 heats a B and an A.

If they do that the so called FANS will bit#h and complain that the car count isn't high enough every night.

I think this year the car count will be near 100, but I think if this format stays, your looking at a car count of 70 or less in 5 years because only the big teams have a chance to make any $$ anymore.

the beauty of the non-qualifyer night was a team having bad luck on Wed or Thursday could get a $5000 payday on Friday to salvage their week with the heavy hitters mostly locked into the A, B and C on Saturday. Now, 1/2 of those heavy hitters are going to be running Friday and those small teams that had the surprise qualifying night and are 17th-20th in points just went from a $9,500 payday guaranteed on Saturday Night to possibly not even making the feature and taking home as little as $1,100 if they choose to stand on their points and start in the B main. This is BAD for the mid-pack / local teams.



Ca Sprintcar fan
May 16, 2012 at 10:36:37 AM
Joined: 01/29/2012
Posts: 905
Reply

only 10 guys get a chance to be 17- 20th starters, that makes no sence to me. They should lock the top 16 in points into the A, the rest of the fields points should be frozen, Friday they should run a complete show, Qual, heats, d,c,b & a mains. the top 4 to spot 17-20. The points given on friday for 5th on back should be added to the wednsday, thursday points to set up Saturdays lineup. JMO


Northern California Sprintcars


Skidooxp19
May 16, 2012 at 10:40:43 AM
Joined: 11/18/2009
Posts: 149
Reply

I haven't seen a purse for Friday. Anyone know? I guess if I laid an egg on my qualifying night I would like another shot at it. I think that's legit. If you don't qualify well at the Natioanls you are in trouble. I hate that. I like the second chance but won't judge until its given a chance.



BigGMan
May 16, 2012 at 02:06:38 PM
Joined: 06/02/2008
Posts: 252
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on May 16 2012 at 10:12:11 AM

I have heard that the option is for everyone, if someone decides to forego their points and run Friday (17th through 26th points position), the next guy in line gets to choose the Top 10 Start in the B or to run Friday.

I personally don't see anyone in position 17-26 foregoing their points.

In my OPINION, this is a bad move overall for the competitors (but the FANS have packed up and gone home on Friday nights in years past because their weren't big enough NAMES running on Friday, so they added the scrambles (and FANS still complained that they thought they were dumb), so they added the World Challenge and last year the Race of Champions (so called FANS still complained), so now the format change to this year.

IMO, we should just go to 3 qualifying nights and break the field up more and FULLY INVERT the heats again. If 100 cars are there, you only are gonna have 33 cars per night though and 3 heats a B and an A.

If they do that the so called FANS will bit#h and complain that the car count isn't high enough every night.

I think this year the car count will be near 100, but I think if this format stays, your looking at a car count of 70 or less in 5 years because only the big teams have a chance to make any $$ anymore.

the beauty of the non-qualifyer night was a team having bad luck on Wed or Thursday could get a $5000 payday on Friday to salvage their week with the heavy hitters mostly locked into the A, B and C on Saturday. Now, 1/2 of those heavy hitters are going to be running Friday and those small teams that had the surprise qualifying night and are 17th-20th in points just went from a $9,500 payday guaranteed on Saturday Night to possibly not even making the feature and taking home as little as $1,100 if they choose to stand on their points and start in the B main. This is BAD for the mid-pack / local teams.



Very important point in Vande's last paragraph. I've heard from at least one well known driver (former WOO) that it really hurts not to have the opportunity to pick up some decent money on Friday. They've been running a small independent operation with limited sponsorship and need every dollar in winnings they can pick up. (this was said to me during last year's nationals and I don't see the situation being much better with this year's changes.) What if they took 2 from Friday's a-main directly to the Sat. A-main but started them behind the transfers from Sat. B? That would be 18 locked in from Wed. & Thur., four from the B, and two from Friday. Personally, I don't think the World Challenge and the Race of Champions add that much to the program, but I don't think there's a lot that can be done to bring in the fans that want to take a night off.

vande77
May 16, 2012 at 03:44:54 PM
Joined: 01/20/2005
Posts: 2079
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: zerorules on May 16 2012 at 06:45:56 AM
Go back to old way 4 heats and c,b,a,mains. On wendsday & Thursday take top 24 in a main each night wendsday inside row & Thursday outside row or vice a versis . If you make the a main on wed.& Thursday you do not run on friday. The new way makes it easyer for the outlaws that are not in a main to get in and not have to run c or b mains.


In my 38 years of attending, I don't ever remember the format being like that. Your qualifying night has NEVER (since it's been a 4 day event) had 1 nights qualifyers on the inside and the other night on the Outside, it's always been determined by point total (I don't remember exactly when they expanded to the 4 nights, but I know it's been 4 nights for 27 years straight for sure.




MissouriSprintFan
May 16, 2012 at 05:55:38 PM
Joined: 09/13/2008
Posts: 419
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on May 16 2012 at 03:44:54 PM

In my 38 years of attending, I don't ever remember the format being like that. Your qualifying night has NEVER (since it's been a 4 day event) had 1 nights qualifyers on the inside and the other night on the Outside, it's always been determined by point total (I don't remember exactly when they expanded to the 4 nights, but I know it's been 4 nights for 27 years straight for sure.



Vande, I think you're right. I think they started the 4 day format in '77 or '78 and that was also when they introduced point system. If I'm not mistaken, before that, the Mains were lined up solely on Time Trial results. They tried different ways trying to make it fair, and at one point did line them up inside rows from one night and the outside rows from the other, because of how the track times could vary so much from one night to the other. They drew a pill to see which night got the inside and outside rows. Lining up solely according to time, they had trouble with drivers that had qualified high for saturdays A not running the rest of their qualifying night program, so they made it mandatory that they had to run their heat. Well, they would just drop to the bottom, make a couple of slow laps, and pull in. This is basically what brought about the point system, so the drivers would have to actually race on their qualifying night. A lot of people like it and a lot don't. It's not perfect (if it wasn't for track conditions changing so much during TT and the luck of the draw playing such a factor, I would say it was near perfect,) but I love the fact that they have to race every time they're on the track instead of the heats being not much more than glorified hotlaps. I would like to see Friday night go back to nonqualifiers night with a complete show, minus Time Trials. Line the heats up according to points. But I'm one that doesn't have to have big names racing to enjoy great racing.

MissouriSprintFan
May 16, 2012 at 06:02:24 PM
Joined: 09/13/2008
Posts: 419
Reply
I'm also one that loved the full invert of the heats. I know, the slower cars are faster now, but that's what made Wednesday and Thursday nights of the Nationals my favorite two race nights of he year.

kooks
May 16, 2012 at 11:36:32 PM
Joined: 02/27/2008
Posts: 703
Reply

Here is how you "fix" the Friday night Nats show.


You run the Wed and Thurs night shows just as they've been run for years with FULLY inverted heat races.


For Friday night you take the cars that are 51-100 in points after Wed/Thurs. Have them run a complete qualifying night with the exact same format as Wed/Thurs again with FULLY inverted heat races. Same purse, points and everything.

The only difference is that the top point man from Friday night would start 11th in the C on Sat.


Now I know this isn't going to make those happy that have to see the big names in order to think they are watching a good show. For everyone that is there to see good racing it would make another excellent night of racing.

Most people always say the Wed and Thurs night races are the best racing of the year, why not copy that and do it again on Friday?




Paintboss
MyWebsite
May 16, 2012 at 11:41:18 PM
Joined: 12/02/2004
Posts: 2127
Reply
The full invert is what makes the Qualifying nights so good. The racers never have to reach so deep as the the heats for the Nationals, Invert 6 or 8 and it makes it just another WoO show.

zerorules
May 17, 2012 at 12:40:21 PM
Joined: 09/01/2011
Posts: 77
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Paintboss on May 16 2012 at 11:41:18 PM
The full invert is what makes the Qualifying nights so good. The racers never have to reach so deep as the the heats for the Nationals, Invert 6 or 8 and it makes it just another WoO show.


I'm with kook. I'm talking early 70s before woo. Ted Johnson was good for sprintcars in his time. New guys are looking to make money for them. Knoxville needs to bring bring back the mystery race.

LR
May 17, 2012 at 01:44:13 PM
Joined: 08/01/2009
Posts: 305
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Paintboss on May 16 2012 at 11:41:18 PM
The full invert is what makes the Qualifying nights so good. The racers never have to reach so deep as the the heats for the Nationals, Invert 6 or 8 and it makes it just another WoO show.


Is the reason for the full inverts not happening only because they don't have 50 cars for each night? Or was it done away with to keep the slowest cars off the front row? When was the last year for full inverts?


vande77
May 17, 2012 at 02:00:14 PM
Joined: 01/20/2005
Posts: 2079
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: LR on May 17 2012 at 01:44:13 PM
Is the reason for the full inverts not happening only because they don't have 50 cars for each night? Or was it done away with to keep the slowest cars off the front row? When was the last year for full inverts?


4 years ago was the last time I think.

I think car count is part of it, I think a bigger part of it was the massive crashes that occurred 2 years in a row. Domain Ramsey (i think anyway) caused a wreck on lap 1 of a heat that took out 6 or 8 cars and never forget about the crash that severely injured Jeff Shepard and essentially ended his racing career...

I think if you ask the drivers, they'd rather go back to an invert of 10 because those extra couple cars gives them a chance to make a BIG move in 1 and 2 before everyone gets strung out. With the invert of 8, ALL of the cars in front of them are good cars, those extra 2 cars sometimes put a guy a second (or two) off of quicktime on the front row and slowed the field going down the straightaway on the opening lap.

I think they should go back to the FULL INVERT, but they should aware BONUS points for passing cars. Some of the best charges the last few years have been Schatz when he didn't transfer through a heat and ran from 21st to 5th on his qualifying night and Shane Stewart last year (in every race he was in).



chilly
May 17, 2012 at 02:24:34 PM
Joined: 12/01/2004
Posts: 976
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on May 17 2012 at 02:00:14 PM

4 years ago was the last time I think.

I think car count is part of it, I think a bigger part of it was the massive crashes that occurred 2 years in a row. Domain Ramsey (i think anyway) caused a wreck on lap 1 of a heat that took out 6 or 8 cars and never forget about the crash that severely injured Jeff Shepard and essentially ended his racing career...

I think if you ask the drivers, they'd rather go back to an invert of 10 because those extra couple cars gives them a chance to make a BIG move in 1 and 2 before everyone gets strung out. With the invert of 8, ALL of the cars in front of them are good cars, those extra 2 cars sometimes put a guy a second (or two) off of quicktime on the front row and slowed the field going down the straightaway on the opening lap.

I think they should go back to the FULL INVERT, but they should aware BONUS points for passing cars. Some of the best charges the last few years have been Schatz when he didn't transfer through a heat and ran from 21st to 5th on his qualifying night and Shane Stewart last year (in every race he was in).



Shepard's crash was in the B-main, and had nothing to do with the invert... FYI



dsc1600
May 17, 2012 at 02:32:58 PM
Joined: 05/31/2007
Posts: 4418
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on May 17 2012 at 02:00:14 PM

4 years ago was the last time I think.

I think car count is part of it, I think a bigger part of it was the massive crashes that occurred 2 years in a row. Domain Ramsey (i think anyway) caused a wreck on lap 1 of a heat that took out 6 or 8 cars and never forget about the crash that severely injured Jeff Shepard and essentially ended his racing career...

I think if you ask the drivers, they'd rather go back to an invert of 10 because those extra couple cars gives them a chance to make a BIG move in 1 and 2 before everyone gets strung out. With the invert of 8, ALL of the cars in front of them are good cars, those extra 2 cars sometimes put a guy a second (or two) off of quicktime on the front row and slowed the field going down the straightaway on the opening lap.

I think they should go back to the FULL INVERT, but they should aware BONUS points for passing cars. Some of the best charges the last few years have been Schatz when he didn't transfer through a heat and ran from 21st to 5th on his qualifying night and Shane Stewart last year (in every race he was in).



I think more guys make it from 8th into the A Main than 10th. It was getting to the point, especially when the track was too wet where it was impossible to even get to 4th, let alone win it. I think the 8 car invert is fine.





MissouriSprintFan
May 17, 2012 at 02:42:20 PM
Joined: 09/13/2008
Posts: 419
Reply
Wasn't there a couple of years they took the slowest 10 and put them in a heat by themselves? Don't remember how they worked the points with them. The total inverts are an incredible thing to witness when someone maneuvers 1 and 2 perfectly. I've seen Steve Kinser twice and Terry McCarl once start on the back row and be leading coming out of 2. Amazing and almost unbelievable.

kooks
May 18, 2012 at 08:01:44 AM
Joined: 02/27/2008
Posts: 703
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: MissouriSprintFan on May 17 2012 at 02:42:20 PM
Wasn't there a couple of years they took the slowest 10 and put them in a heat by themselves? Don't remember how they worked the points with them. The total inverts are an incredible thing to witness when someone maneuvers 1 and 2 perfectly. I've seen Steve Kinser twice and Terry McCarl once start on the back row and be leading coming out of 2. Amazing and almost unbelievable.


Back in the days of big car counts they had the "last chance" heats.


These were for the cars that timed 51 and up. They ran something like 8 laps and the top 2 cars got to tag the back of their qualifying night C-main.

Its been quite a few years since they've had a last chance heat.


I don't remember ever seeing anybody go from last to 1st coming out of 2 but I remember a few times of someone starting last and leading all 10 laps. Most memorable was Sammy about 10 yrs ago when he was still in the Channel Lock car.





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy