|
|
|
|
|
Topic: Help me pick a new number
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
|
Page 1 of 2 of 20 replies
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
08:14:53 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
03/19/2010
|
|
Posts:
|
3
|
|
|
|
Hey guys and gals, I'm changing my number this year, it has been 52 for the last few years, but a little shift in our team has left me looking for a new one. I want to have a number that has some historical significance. I ran 9 for a while (Gary Wright is my all-time favourite) but unfortunately that number has been taken and our rules dont allow for multiples, unfortunately. So, give me a number and a good reason why to run it!
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
08:26:25 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
09/03/2009
|
|
Posts:
|
532
|
|
|
|
You want to get a number that is easy to write quickly. When scoring cars during races manually its easier to write easy numbers down. Electronically doesn't matter. Also a number that is simple and looks good when done up in large configuration. #1 is the easiest and #s like 8 or stuff like that is hard. #7 sounds good.
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
08:30:24 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
04/21/2005
|
|
Posts:
|
35
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: topless52 on February 03 2011 at 08:14:53 PM
Hey guys and gals, I'm changing my number this year, it has been 52 for the last few years, but a little shift in our team has left me looking for a new one. I want to have a number that has some historical significance. I ran 9 for a while (Gary Wright is my all-time favourite) but unfortunately that number has been taken and our rules dont allow for multiples, unfortunately. So, give me a number and a good reason why to run it!
|
How about 7? 5+2=7.
If you don't like that you could also just reverse the order and go with 25.
Final thought would be 97. A tribute to Wright with the 9 and the history of the 52 represented in the 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
08:36:01 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/03/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
1330
|
|
|
|
0 or 00
that should work for you
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
08:50:44 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
02/03/2011
|
|
Posts:
|
1
|
|
|
|
57 is great !
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
08:57:11 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
08/16/2010
|
|
Posts:
|
7
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: topless52 on February 03 2011 at 08:14:53 PM
Hey guys and gals, I'm changing my number this year, it has been 52 for the last few years, but a little shift in our team has left me looking for a new one. I want to have a number that has some historical significance. I ran 9 for a while (Gary Wright is my all-time favourite) but unfortunately that number has been taken and our rules dont allow for multiples, unfortunately. So, give me a number and a good reason why to run it!
|
Go with a # that you usually don't see on a sprint car. I hate going to a track and seeing three cars with same #.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
09:01:59 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
05/07/2005
|
|
Posts:
|
59
|
|
|
|
Wasn't AJ #14? How about that for historic.....the greatest ever in a racecar.
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
09:37:40 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
08/10/2007
|
|
Posts:
|
1797
|
|
|
|
How about just a Letter X thats something you don't see to often.
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
09:55:08 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
07/22/2008
|
|
Posts:
|
812
|
|
|
|
Ever notice that at almost every race the majority of cars use numbers less than 50? In most cases close to 3/4 of the field are numbered less than the number 50.
Ok...its icy I and cabin fever and I am bored
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
09:56:15 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/26/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
1355
|
|
|
|
This year is the 100 anniversary of the first Indianapolis 500. In 1911 Ray Harroun drove #32 to victory. I'd go with #32.
|
|
|
|
|
February 03, 2011 at
10:09:27 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/07/2006
|
|
Posts:
|
174
|
|
|
|
12 the great Wayne Sue. the flyin cropduster from Live Oak, CA.
|
|
|
|
February 04, 2011 at
08:25:18 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
07/10/2007
|
|
Posts:
|
947
|
|
|
|
76. I don't believe I've seen that number on a race car since PJ Chesson. I would bet you won't see many multiples with that one
do it in the dirt
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 04, 2011 at
08:32:10 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/01/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
278
|
|
|
|
I'm a big fan of 91, as you can see by my screen name. I've been racing karts for a lot of years and have used 91 for the majority of them. Came up with it because my dad has also raced karts for years and always used #19, as he was and still is a big Steve Smith Sr. fan. I didn't want to run the same number so I just flipped it and it stuck. Plus, I think it looks pretty cool on the car.
|
|
|
|
|
February 04, 2011 at
08:53:11 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
08/06/2008
|
|
Posts:
|
439
|
|
|
How about 69! Then everybody is happy! 
|
|
|
|
|
February 04, 2011 at
09:25:20 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
01/19/2009
|
|
Posts:
|
587
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Oppermanfan on February 04 2011 at 08:53:11 AM
How about 69! Then everybody is happy!
|
96...it is 96 whether right side up or upside down. haha. hope ya never do the latter tho
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 04, 2011 at
09:25:20 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
08/10/2007
|
|
Posts:
|
1797
|
|
|
This message was edited on
February 04, 2011 at
09:25:50 AM by SLINK51
Reply to:
Posted By: Oppermanfan on February 04 2011 at 08:53:11 AM
How about 69! Then everybody is happy!
|
Why not 77 because you get ate more.
|
|
|
|
|
February 04, 2011 at
09:42:26 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
03/01/2005
|
|
Posts:
|
277
|
|
|
|
My # is 91, and I ended up with that by way of # 9. When I was a kid I played hockey and wore # 9 for Gordy Howe. One season I destroyed my teams #9 jersey and went to #19 to keep the 9. From then on I kept #19 for hockey and lacrosse. I won't put 19 on a race car for reasons I won't go into, so I went with 91. So by my logic I would go with 19 or 91.
|
|
|
|
February 04, 2011 at
10:25:53 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
03/28/2009
|
|
Posts:
|
190
|
|
|
|
I've been thinking about changing my number to 77, or 75, in memory of The Rocket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 04, 2011 at
11:59:26 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
02/04/2011
|
|
Posts:
|
1
|
|
|
|
What was the day/date you lost your virginity? as I'm sure that was a HISTORICAL event?
|
|
|
|
|
February 04, 2011 at
02:24:34 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/17/2009
|
|
Posts:
|
2265
|
|
|
|
How about 4Q ???
|
|
|
